Study on the implementation of active methodologies in higher education: benefits and challenges
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A review of the literature on the implementation of active methodologies in higher education reveals that these pedagogical approaches, such as Problem-Based Learning, Collaborative Learning, and the flipped classroom, offer significant benefits, including improved academic performance and the development of crucial soft skills. These methodologies promote more dynamic and participatory learning, increasing student motivation and engagement by allowing them to apply knowledge in real contexts. However, their implementation faces several challenges, such as resistance to change on the part of teachers and students, lack of resources and adequate training, and the need for new forms of assessment that reflect the competencies developed. Adaptation to different disciplines and cultural contexts is also essential to maximize the effectiveness of these methodologies. Educational institutions must provide ongoing support to teachers and ensure adequate infrastructure to facilitate the effective adoption of these practices. Future research should focus on how to adapt active methodologies to diverse disciplines and contexts, and on the development of appropriate assessment tools. In other words, although active methodologies present challenges, their potential to transform higher education is significant, and with the right support, they can better prepare students for the challenges of the 21st century.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Derechos de autor
Las obras que se publican en 593 Digital Publisher CEIT están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1.1. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
1.1.a. Se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL).
1.1.b. No se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos.
1.1.c. Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
References
Acosta, E. G. R., Cedeño-Tapia, S. J., Diaz-Jurado, L. C., Escalona-Márquez, L. N., Ramírez-Pérez, T., & Vargas, E. C. (2023). Importance of academic literacy in the training of nursing students[Importancia de la lectoescritura académica en la formación de estudiantes de enfermería]. Gaceta Medica Boliviana, 46(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.47993/gmb.v46i1.631
Aguirre, P., Villota, F. H., & Mera, S. (2023). Sustainability in higher education in Ecuador- Universidad Técnica del Norte case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(5), 1136–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0268
Chica, M. L. V., & la Vega Hernández, I. M. De. (2023). Transfer of knowledge from universities to organizations in the Ecuadorian context. Measuring Business Excellence, 27(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-07-2021-0097
de la Torre, M. F. M.-G., Velastegui-Hernández, R. S., Mayorga-Ases, M. J., & Morales-Jaramillo, M. B. (2024). Dificultades de aprendizaje en estudiantes de educación superior. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT | ISSN 2588-0705, 9(4), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2024.4.2546
de Romero, J. G., Párraga, W. A. M., Torres, P. I. G., & Macias, N. M. (2023). Training in values in the school environment: Perspective of the social professional in Portoviejo-Ecuador[Formación en valores en el ámbito escolar: Perspectiva del profesional de lo social en Portoviejo-Ecuador]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i3.40712
Espinoza, J. J. R., & Soria-Miranda, N. L. (2023). Tutoring as a tool for academic performance improvement during the Covid-19 pandemic: A contribution to the formative and shared evaluation in Ecuador. In Formative and Shared Assessment to Promote Global University Learning (pp. 211–228). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3537-3.ch011
Guamán, G. V. T., Quizhpe, L. D. C. M., Obregón, L. S. J., & Sánchez, M. A. T. (2023). Integrated information system in higher education institutions in Ecuador. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 28(9), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.52080/RVGLUZ.28.E9.48
Lara Satán, A. A., Satán, N. L., Velastegui Hernández, R. S., & Pullas Tapia, P. S. (2020). Organization and management in the prevention of occupational psychosocial risks in urban public transport. Universidad y Sociedad, 12(4), 355–362.
Merchán-Rodríguez, V., & Zambrano-Vera, D. (2023). Budget and capabilities of information technology governance: empirical analysis in higher education institutes. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12(2), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i2.4302
Moreira-Choez, J. S., Castro-Castillo, G. J., Mera-Plaza, C. L., & Arias-Iturralde, M. C. (2024). Internationalization in higher education: Practices and processes of change between Ecuador and the Netherlands. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(2), 671–680. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.2.34
Ramón-Poma, G. M., Cordero-Guzmán, D. M., & Jaramillo-Calle, C. Y. (2024). Intellectual capital and its impact on Ecuadorian Higher Education Institutions[Capital intelectual y su impacto en las Instituciones de Educación Superior ecuatorianas]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 30(ESPECIAL), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v30i.42249
Reinoso, J. R. R., del Cisne Aguirre Ullauri, M., Gavilánes, M. E. O., & Aguirre, M. C. U. (2023). University teaching in Ecuador: Challenges from the gender perspective[Docencia universitaria en el Ecuador: Desafíos desde el enfoque de género]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29(3), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i3.40709
Remesal, A., & Villarroel, V. (2023). Challenges for Post-Pandemic Virtual Education in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis of the Emergency Remote Higher Education Process in Chile, Mexico, and Ecuador. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU151914199
Santos, J. C., Cerezo-Segovia, B. A., Amorim, G. B., Lince, M. L. E., García, G. V. M., Navas, C. D. H., & Mendoza, O. P. V. (2024). University students’ perspectives on online English language learning: Implications for Ecuadorian educators. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 1183. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1183
Silva-Martínez, G., Iglesias-Martínez, M. J., & Lozano-Cabezas, I. (2023). A Qualitative Study on Barriers in Learning Opportunities in Ecuadorian Higher Education. Societies, 13(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13030056
Velastegui, R., Poler, R., & Díaz-Madroñero, M. (2023). Aplicación de algoritmos de aprendizaje automático a sistemas robóticos multiagente para la programación y control de operaciones productivas y logísticas: una revisión de la literatura reciente. Direccion y Organizacion, 80, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.37610/DYO.V0I80.643
Yépez, A., Torres, C., Ramayo, Y., & Morales, C. (2023). Student Feedback on Evaluation and Assessment Processes in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(5), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i5.5969
Zamora, T. A. C., Nuñez, A. I. M., Oviedo, J. E. R., & Cruz-Fernández, G. M. D. La. (2024). Model of Activities for the Mastery of Research Skills in Higher Education in Ecuador. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(4), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0115