Equality and economic reparation of natural persons in protection action in Ecuador.

Main Article Content

Franquiel Milán-Benítez
Samuel Morales-Castro

Abstract

The investigation studied regularities typical of the protection action, contrasting the legal regulation contained in the Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control of Ecuador, with its practical application, particularly, in the economic reparation of natural persons and their procedural tract that passes through. a path different from that established to compensate natural persons, when the defendant is the Ecuadorian State. In that sense, it has been critically compared how the mandatory requirement recognized in article 19, of the normative body in question, manifests unequal treatment in the face of similar factual and legal situations, which unnecessarily destroy the principle of equality of legal subjects before the same. Law, and reinforce the mandatory questioning of lege data and lege ferenda. Therefore, this legal questioning has been supported by a profuse jurisprudence, where there are different criteria regarding the subject, which oscillate between positions that make a broad interpretation and other reductionist ones that, inevitably, have a negative impact on the full enjoyment of the fundamental rights, due process and effective protection of the actors in this type of antagonism. Motivating the aforementioned background, a possible proposal for reform of the norm in conflict was directed, with a solution consistent with the principles and guarantees established in the Constitution; contributing to the maintenance of the harmony that must prevail in the legal system. In such a way that the procedural treatment must follow a similar iter to maintain the principle of equality intact in this peculiar legal relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Milán-Benítez, F. ., & Morales-Castro, S. . (2024). Equality and economic reparation of natural persons in protection action in Ecuador. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 9(6), 680-695. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2024.6.2765
Section
Investigaciones /estudios empíricos
Author Biographies

Franquiel Milán-Benítez, Universidad Bolivariana de Ecuador - Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6473-8745

Graduate in Law. University of Oriente, Cuba. Master in Procedural Law, Bolivarian University of Ecuador. Diploma in Administration of Justice corresponding to the Higher School of Judicial Training of the Popular Court system of the Republic of Cuba, Matanzas, Cuba October 2003-July 2004. Postgraduate degree in “Methodology of Social Research: its application in Legal Sciences ¨, Legal Research Center, Havana, Cuba, June 2010. Postgraduate in Safety and Health at Work, University of Granma, Bayamo MN, Cuba, January 2014. IX National Forum and IV International Forum of Legal and Forensic Psychology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, October 2023. Course on Nullity and Illegality of the Administrative Act, School of the Judicial Function, Quito, November 2023.

Samuel Morales-Castro, Universidad Bolivariana de Ecuador - Ecuador

https://www.593dp.com/photos/50/moralesc.jpg

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-2516

Graduate in History and Law. University of Havana. Specialist in Civil Law and Doctor in Legal Science (PhD) from the university itself. Lawyer from the University of Otavalo in Ecuador. Degree in Law, Master in International Trade Law, Master in Legal Practice and Expert in Trial Litigation Techniques, from the University of La Rioja. Master in Maritime Law from the Abat Oliba CEU University of Barcelona. Doctor in Legal and Political Sciences (PhD) from the Pablo de Olavide University of Seville, Spain. Undergraduate and postgraduate professor and coordinator of the free Legal Clinic of the Bolivarian University of Ecuador. Lawyer in free practice and accredited researcher

 

 

References

Ávila Santamaría, R. (2011). Del amparo a la acción de protección jurisdiccional. Genealogía de la justicia constitucional ecuatoriana. Ed. Dunia Martínez Molina. Quito, Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición/ CEDEC, 2011, p. 233.

Benavides Benalcázar, M. M. (2019). La reparación integral de la víctima en el proceso penal. Revista Universidad y Sociedad. 11(5), 410-420.

Cueva Carrión, L. (2015). Reparación integral y daño al proyecto de vida. Cuenca-Ecuador: Editorial Cueva Carrión.

Montaña Pinto, J. (2011) Apuntes de derecho procesal constitucional: aspectos generales, t. 1., editor. 1ª ed.- Quito: Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición, 2011. p. 249.

Real Academia Española. (2014). Reparación. Diccionario de la lengua española (Vol. 22). Real Academia Española, Madrid: https://dle.rae.es/reparaci%C3%B3n

Ruiz Guzmán Alfredo, Aguirre Castro Pamela Juliana, Avila Benavidez Dayana Fernanda, Ron Erráez Ximena Patricia “Reparación Integral Análisis a partir de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador” Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. 2018

Leyes Nacionales:

Ecuador. Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449, 20 de octubre de 2008.

Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. Registro Oficial Suplemento 52, 22 de octubre de 2009.

Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial. Registro Oficial Suplemento 52, 22 de octubre de 2009.

Instrumentos Internacionales de Derechos Humanos:

ONU. Asamblea General. Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos, 10 de diciembre de 1948. https://www.un.org/es/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Resolución 60/147 aprobada por la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (Principios y Directrices Básicos de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas) el 16 de diciembre de 2005. https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-and-guidelines-right-remedy-and-reparation

Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, sitio digital San José, Costa Rica, el veintidós de noviembre de mil novecientos sesenta y nueve. https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/1969_Convenci%C3%B3n_Americana_sobre_Derechos_Humanos.pdf

Sentencia Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos:

Corte IDH, “Sentencia de 20 de enero de 1999 (Reparaciones y Costas)”, Caso Suárez Rosero Vs. Ecuador, 20 de enero de 1999, párrafo 42, http://corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_44_esp.pdf.

Sentencias Corte Constitucional del Ecuador:

Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición. Sentencia n.º 0140-12-SEP-CC, de 17 abril 2012, dentro del Caso n.º 1739-10-EP. http://doc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec:8080/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/6366919c-dc71-45e6-8c4a-8cb62601a411/1739-10-EP-sent.pdf

Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición. Sentencia No. 004-13-SAN-CC CASO No. 0015-10-AN. http://doc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec:8080/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/5ec31b0a-1c0a-469b-8b81-60f869d33853/REL_SENTENCIA_004-13-SAN-CC.pdf

Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición Sentencia n.º 016-13-SEP-CC, de 16 mayo 2013, dentro del Caso n.º 1000-12-EP. http://doc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec:8080/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/52586c09-c0c8-4d4d-97ab-7e855d5481de/1000-12-ep-sen-lcca.pdf?guest=true

Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición. Sentencia No. 019-16-SIN-CC CASO No. 0090-15-IN DMQ, 22 de marzo de 2016. http://doc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec:8080/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/e34d25a5-cc11-4d06-b9d4-9d33af4c7a63/0090-15-in-sen.pdf?guest=true

Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición. Sentencia No. 61-19-IN/21 CASO No. 61-19-IN Quito, D.M. 21 de diciembre de 2021. https://www.edicioneslegales-informacionadicional.com/webmaster/directorio/EC2_2022.pdf

Sentencia No. 1808-15-EP/21 CASO No. 1808-15-EP Juez ponente: Alí Lozada Prado Quito, D.M. 18 de agosto de 2021. http://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J3RyYW1pdGUnLCB1dWlkOidlNzIxYzhhNy1kZTQzLTRhZDktODUwNS0zMjRkZDEwZjljMmUucGRmJ30=