Notion of Justice between Custom and Positive Law, Macusani District – Puno Region

Main Article Content

Flavio Jesús Mamani-Hancco
Jimy Humpiri-Nuñez
Luz Mery Chavez-Cahuana

Abstract

The present research work responds to the latent problem in the Puno region, especially in the Macusani district, on the notion of justice between custom and positive law, as a result of which the objective was to analyze the notion of justice that residents present between custom and positive law in the district of Macusani - Puno Region, to achieve this objective I conducted a qualitative approach research because it sought to know the perception regarding the function of the administration of justice according to the settlers in the district of Macusani - Puno Region, for this a direct interview was applied to the designated settlers, an intentional sample of population groups was selected between patrolmen, settlers, prosecutors and judges. Once the investigation was developed, it was evidenced that the custom or customary law still prevails over time, therefore, it constitutes a form of justice in the district of Macusani, however, it is agreed that the positive law is more effective at These are cases that go against the fundamental rights of the person despite the administrative bureaucracy that burdens them. Therefore, today the Customary Law is still considered the most effective, less expensive and less lengthy way of administering justice than the Positive Law in the administration of justice with regard to daily and minor crimes that occur in the district. from Macusani, Puno region

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mamani-Hancco, F., Humpiri-Nuñez, J., & Chavez-Cahuana, L. (2022). Notion of Justice between Custom and Positive Law, Macusani District – Puno Region. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 7(4-2), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2022.4-2.1331
Section
Law
Author Biographies

Flavio Jesús Mamani-Hancco, Universidad Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez - Perú

Doktorale student in Kriminele Wetenskappe, van die Andes Universiteit Néstor Cáceres Velásquez, Meester in Strafprosesreg, huidige burgemeester van die Provinsiale Munisipaliteit van Azángaro, tydperk 2019 tot 2022, Nasionale President van die Netwerk van Stedelike en Landelike Munisipaliteite van Peru - REMURPE” ( 01/2019 tot op datum). 

Jimy Humpiri-Nuñez, Universidad Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez - Perú

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-8403

Professor at the Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences of the “Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez” University, Peru, with more than 10 years of teaching experience in undergraduate and graduate studies. 

Teacher with research profile registered in CONCYTEC 

Lawyer of the "Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez" University 

Bachelor of Social Work at the National University of the Altiplano Puno. 

Master in civil and business law at the "Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez" University 

Master's studies in Epistemology from the National University of San Marcos 

Doctor of Law from the “Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez” University 

Director of the Research Unit of the Postgraduate School of the “Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez” University (2020) 

Head of the Research Office at the “Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez” University (05/15/2022 to date) 

Luz Mery Chavez-Cahuana, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano - Perú

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-8093

Lawyer from the Andean University Néstor Cáceres Velásquez-Juliaca, Bachelor of Communication Sciences, Master in Administrative Law and Public Management from the National University of the Altiplano, Member of the Peruvian Institute of Intellectual Production, Puno - Peru (01/2021 - to date).   

References

Bazán Cerdán, F. (2015). Estado del arte del derecho consuetudinario: El caso de Perú. Revista IIDH, 51–82. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r08062-2.pdf

Carrasco Díaz, S. (2005). Metodología de la Investigación Científica. Editorial San Marcos.

Castillo Gallardo, M. (2009). Pueblos Indígenas y Derecho Consuetudinario. Un Debate Sobre las Teorías del Multiculturalismo. Nueva Antropología A.C. México, XXII(71), 13–29. https://revistas-colaboracion.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/nueva-antropologia/article/view/15077

Gargarella, R. (2018). Sobre el “nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 1(27), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.26851/rucp.27.5

Hernández Sampieri, R., Férnadez Collado, C., & Baptista, M. del P. (2014). Metodogología de la Investigación (Sexta). McGraw - Hill.

Kelsen, H. (2008). La doctrina del derecho natural y el positivismo jurídico. Revista Sobre La Enseñanza Del Derecho, 6(12), 183–198. http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/rev_academia/revistas/12/la-doctrina-del-derecho-natural-y-el-positivismo-juridico.pdf

Monje Álvarez, A. (2011). Metodología de la Investigación Cuantitativa y Cualitativa - Guía didáctica. Universidad Surcolombiana.

Ollero, A. (2012). Todos de acuerdo: sólo es derecho el derecho positivo. In Homenaje al profesor Jose Antonio Escudero (Primera ed). Editorial Complutense S.A