The right to equality and non-discrimination in the enjoyment of annual leave within the labor regimes of the ecuadorian public sector

Main Article Content

Betty Enid Andrango-Ushiña
José Augusto García-Díaz

Abstract

This article addresses the right to equality and non-discrimination in the enjoyment of annual vacations, within the different existing labor regimes in the Ecuadorian public sector. On this subject, it is necessary to point out that in the public sector in general, the regulations have established a difference based on the functions entrusted to its employees. Thus, on the one hand, we find the public servant in charge of the administrative and representative functions of an institution, and on the other the workers who contribute with manual activities, each one carrying out specialized and important activities for the fulfillment of institutional objectives. In addition to those differences based on their activities within a public institution, the exercise and enjoyment of the rights acquired as workers are equally protected through the principles of intangibility, inalienability and progressivity in the terms provided within the constitution. By virtue of that, the central objective of this work is to analyze whether there is discrimination or differential treatment in the enjoyment of vacations between public servants or workers in the Public Sector. The main points of analysis were addressed: The labor regime in the Ecuadorian public sector; The public servant and the worker within state institutions; The constitutional amendments to the LOSEP; Comparative legislation of the right to annual vacations that public servants and workers have; Right to formal and material equality and non-discrimination in the workplace. The research methodology used was: Scientific and explanatory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nápoles, Y., & García-Díaz, J. (2022). The right to equality and non-discrimination in the enjoyment of annual leave within the labor regimes of the ecuadorian public sector. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT | ISSN 2588-0705, 7(3-2), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2022.3-2.1158
Section
Law
Author Biographies

Betty Enid Andrango-Ushiña, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica - Ecuador

andrango.jpg

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-0156

Lawyer of the Tribunals and Courts of the Republic of Ecuador

Treasury Assistant-JNDA;human resources assistant - JNDA; Executive secretary 2-SECOB;Human resources analyst 1-SECOB;Human resources analyst 2-SECOB;Sr. Analyst of disciplinary regime - BanEcuador B.P. to the present.

 

The elimination of the Central State contribution of 40% to the IESS budget, compared to the right to social security

José Augusto García-Díaz, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica - Ecuador

diaz.jpg

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-8364

Law degree, PUCE (2014)

 

Procedural law specialist, UASB (2016)

 

Master at procedural law UISEK (2018)

Research:

  • The figure of termination ef the labor contract due to acts of God of force majeure, reflections based on the appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ecuador and the interpretative rule contained in the Humanitarian Support Law.
  • The precautionary measures applicable in administrative procedures

References

-2007-69-2007 (Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia 16 de 10 de 2007). Obtenido de https://www.jurisprudencia.gob.sv/DocumentosBoveda/D/1/2000-2009/2007/10/2DBB.PDF

-2016-05885 (UNIDAD JUDICIAL DE TRABAJO CON SEDE EN LA PARROQUIA IÑAQUITO DEL DISTRITO METROPOLITANO DE QUITO, PROVINCIA DE PICHINCHA 2 de junio de 2017).

BORJA, R. (1997). Enciclopedia de la Polìtica. Mèxico: Progreso.

Código de Trabajo. (2015). Quito: Ediciones Legales.

Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (s.f.). www.defensa.gob.ec. Obtenido de https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/02/Constitucion-de-la-Republica-del-Ecuador_act_ene-2021.pdf

Constitución Política de Colombia. (2019). www.acnur.org. Obtenido de https://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2001/0219.pdf

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (s.f.). http://portal.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/. Obtenido de http://portal.corteconstitucional.gob.ec:8494/FichaRelatoria.aspx?numdocumento=002-18-SIN-CC

Dirección del Trabajo. (2014). Código de Trabajo. Santiago: Agustinas.

Fundación Acción Pro Derechos Humanos. (21 de 03 de 2022). DerechosHumanos.net. Obtenido de http://www.derechoshumanos.net/normativa/normas/1966-PactoDerechosCivilesyPoliticos.htm

Fundación MF. (29 de 09 de 2021). https://www.fundacionmf.org. Obtenido de https://www.fundacionmf.org.ar/visor-producto.php?cod_producto=5639

GOV.CO. (20 de 03 de 2020). https://www.gov.co/home/. Obtenido de https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=1466#8

GRANJA G, N. (2006). Fundamentos de Derecho Administrativo. Quito-Ecuador: Jurídica del Ecuador.

INEC. (09 de 14 de 2021). https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/institucional/home/. Obtenido de https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/empleo-julio-2021/

Joaquin, F. V. (2011). Los Derechos Humanos de Personalidad. Quito: Librería Jurídica.

La Corte. (23 de 03 de 2022). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov. Obtenido de https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1998/C-003-98.htm#:~:text=Dice%20la%20sentencia%20que%20los,trata%20de%20categor%C3%ADas%20constitucionales%20diferentes.