Recycled brick as an alternative material for the manufacture of masonry

Main Article Content

Otto Omar Rodas-Cabrera
Pedro Javier Angumba-Aguilar

Abstract

The construction industry is responsible for 75% of the consumption of the earth's natural resources and its waste represents 50% of the volume disposed of in landfills, generating negative impacts for the economy, society and the environment. In the city of Cuenca, a monthly average of 25,000 m3 of debris is recorded. Brick and concrete represent 75% of construction waste. The objective of this research is to determine the volume of discarded brick and its technical characteristics, to constitute it as an alternative material in the manufacture of a masonry element, contributing to the reduction of the consumption of natural resources and environmental pollution. This research is of a mixed type, (quantitative and qualitative) experimental that collects data provided by the expert builders of the College of Architects of Azuay through a digital survey and the review of bibliographic information. As a result, the 1,250 buildings built by these professionals generate 656.25 m3 of discarded brick per year, being considered an alternative material for the manufacture of the new masonry element. Based on the reviewed bibliography, 2 types of blocks were made, replacing the pumice material with crushed brick. The blocks that replaced 30% of the coarse aggregate (Type B) increased their weight by 15% and maintained their compressive strength and met the requirement demanded by the Ecuadorian Technical Standard and the demands of this research; while those that replaced 100% of the powder volume obtained unsatisfactory results, their weight was similar, but their compressive strength was reduced to 47%. The manufacture of 60 Type B blocks will save 0.18 m3 of natural material and their use in a 150 m2 house will avoid the natural exploitation of 15 m3 of natural material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodas-Cabrera, O., & Angumba-Aguilar, P. (2024). Recycled brick as an alternative material for the manufacture of masonry. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 9(3), 1200-1221. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2024.3.2481
Section
Investigaciones /estudios empíricos
Author Biographies

Otto Omar Rodas-Cabrera, Universidad Católica de Cuenca - Ecuador

0000-0002-4077-5826

Born on March 29, 1974 in the city of Azogues-Cañar-Ecuador; Higher studies completed at the University of Cuenca, graduating as an Architect in May 1999; free practice professional and construction contractor for the state 1999-2019; president of the College of Architects of the province of Cañar; public servant of the State

Pedro Javier Angumba-Aguilar, Universidad Católica de Cuenca - Ecuador

By profession Architect, dedicated to free professional practice, university professor, researcher and specialist in the area of construction. With fourth level training: Master in Construction, Master in Renewable Energy, Master in Artificial Intelligence applied to Architecture and Engineering and a diploma in University Teaching. Publication of 8 articles.

References

¿Qué materiales de construcción son más fáciles de reciclar? - Infobae. (n.d.). Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://www.infobae.com/economia/real-estate/2019/10/21/que-materiales-de-construccion-son-mas-faciles-de-reciclar/

Adesina, A., & Awoyera, P. (2019). Overview of trends in the application of waste materials in self-compacting concrete production. In SN Applied Sciences (Vol. 1, Issue 9). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1012-4

Augusto Euphrosino, C., Jacintho, A. E. P. G. de A., Lorena Pimentel, L., Camarini, G., & Fontanini, P. S. P. (2022). Tijolos de solo-cimento usados para Habitação de Interesse social (HIS) em mutirão: estudo de caso em olaria comunitária. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2021-47087

Cachim, P. B. (2009). Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(3), 1292–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.023

Domingo, N., & Batty, T. (2021). Construction waste modelling for residential construction projects in New Zealand to enhance design outcomes. Waste Management, 120, 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.010

Escombrera – EMAC. (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2022, from https://emac.gob.ec/servicios/escombrera/

Ghaffar, S. H., Burman, M., & Braimah, N. (2020). Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710

Kazemi, M., Madandoust, R., & de Brito, J. (2019). Compressive strength assessment of recycled aggregate concrete using Schmidt rebound hammer and core testing. Construction and Building Materials, 224, 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.110

Khatib, J. M. (2005). Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(4), 763–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.017

Kisku, N., Joshi, H., Ansari, M., Panda, S. K., Nayak, S., & Dutta, S. C. (2017). A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material. In Construction and Building Materials (Vol. 131, pp. 721–740). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029

Krauklis, A. E., Karl, C. W., Gagani, A. I., & Jørgensen, J. K. (2021). Composite material recycling technology—state-of-the-art and sustainable development for the 2020s. In Journal of Composites Science (Vol. 5, Issue 1). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5010028

Minunno, R., O’Grady, T., Morrison, G. M., Gruner, R. L., & Colling, M. (2018). Strategies for applying the circular economy to prefabricated buildings. Buildings, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8090125

Muñoz-Pérez, S. P., Mimbela-Orderique, F., & Rodriguez-Lafitte, E. D. (2021). Uso de ladrillos triturados en concreto: una revisión literaria. Revista Politécnica, 17(34), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.33571/rpolitec.v17n34a6

Narcis, N., Ray, I., & Hosein, G. (2019). Construction and demolition waste management actions and potential benefits: A perspective from Trinidad and Tobago. Buildings, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS9060150

Sathiparan, N., Subramaniam, D. N., Malsara, K. G. N., & Akmal, M. S. M. (2022). Thermal comfort analysis of fired-clay brick, cement-sand block and cement stabilized earth block masonry house models. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 7(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00744-9

Ullauri, M. C. A., Romero Bastidas, M., Bustamante, J. R., & Castillo Carchipulla, E. (n.d.). El ladrillo artesanal de Cuenca (Ecuador): una caracterización inicial en el marco patrimonial. https://doi.org/10.14568/cp26915

Wong, C. L., Mo, K. H., Yap, S. P., Alengaram, U. J., & Ling, T. C. (2018). Potential use of brick waste as alternate concrete-making materials: A review. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 195, pp. 226–239). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.193

Zanelli, C., Marrocchino, E., Guarini, G., Toffano, A., Vaccaro, C., & Dondi, M. (2021). Recycling Construction and Demolition Residues in Clay Bricks. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 8918. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198918

Zhang, Z., Wong, Y. C., Arulrajah, A., & Horpibulsuk, S. (2018). A review of studies on bricks using alternative materials and approaches. In Construction and Building Materials (Vol. 188, pp. 1101–1118). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.152