Infringement of the constitutional right to appeal in traffic offences punishable by non-custodial sentences

Main Article Content

Jonathan Fabián Rivera-Ortiz
Hamilton Andrés Rivera-Ortiz
Shirley Anabel Ramírez-Iñaguazo

Abstract

This research work was carried out in search of the violation of the right to due process in the guarantee of recourse to judgment or resolution in traffic violations punished by non- custodial sentences, taking into account that this impossibility of exercising the right to appeal flagrantly violates the constitutional norm such as international treaties and conventions signed by Ecuador. Through scientific research, the violation of the constitutional right to due process in the guarantee of appeal was demonstrated, using theoretical methods such as inductive and deductive methods that helped to establish the violation of the constitutional right to appeal. This research concluded that the constitutional right to appeal is violated in traffic offences that are punishable by non-custodial sentences. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rivera-Ortiz, J. ., Rivera-Ortiz, H. ., & Ramírez-Iñaguazo, S. . (2023). Infringement of the constitutional right to appeal in traffic offences punishable by non-custodial sentences . 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(6-1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.6-1.2252
Section
Investigaciones /estudios empíricos
Author Biographies

Jonathan Fabián Rivera-Ortiz, Universidad Técnica de Machala - Ecuador

I am Jonathan Fabián Rivera Ortiz, by profession a Lawyer, with experience in civil and constitutional law, graduated from the Regional Autonomous University of the Andes, with outstanding participation in the area of ​​research and scientific production, contributing with knowledge to the development of my career in my area of ​​influence.

Grade of Universidad Técnica de Machala

Hamilton Andrés Rivera-Ortiz, Universidad Técnica de Machala - Ecuador

https://www.593dp.com/photos/44-1/rivera.JPG

I am Hamilton Andrés Rivera Ortiz, by profession a Lawyer, with experience in civil and criminal law, graduated from the Regional Autonomous University of the Andes, with outstanding participation in the area of ​​research and scientific production, contributing with knowledge to the development of my career in my area of ​​influence

Grade of Universidad Técnica de Machala.

Shirley Anabel Ramírez-Iñaguazo, Universidad Técnica de Machala - Ecuador

I am Shirley Anabel Ramírez, Iñaguazo, by profession a Lawyer, with experience in civil and criminal law, graduated from the Regional Autonomous University of the Andes, with outstanding participation in the area of ​​research and scientific production, contributing with knowledge to the development of my career in my area of ​​influence.

Grade of Universidad Técnica de Machala

References

Asamblea General de Estados Americanos. (22 de Noviembre de 1969). Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos. Secretaría De Los Estados Americanos: https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/tratados_b- 32_convencion_americana_sobre_derechos_humanos.htm

Asamblea General de la Naciones Unidas, O. (10 de Diciembre de 1948). Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. Organización de Naciones Unidas: https://www.un.org/es/universal-declaration-human-rights/

Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, N. C. (1948). Declaración Americana de los Derechos y Deberes del Hombre. Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: http://www.oas.org/es/cidh/mandato/Basicos/declaracion.asp

Cornejo, J. (2019). Derecho a Recurrir en el procedimiento abreviado. Derecho Ecuador, 2. Cruz, O. (2015). Defensa a la defensa y Abogacía en México. México: UNAM.

Dávila Álvarez, J. (2019). El Recurso de Apelación en materia procesal penal frente a la doble conformidad. Guayaquil: Repositorio UCSG. http://192.188.52.94:8080/bitstream/3317/14034/1/T-UCSG-POS-MDDP-24.pdf

García Arteaga, I. (2016). Repositorio Universidad de las Américas. http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/bitstream/33000/6169/1/UDLA-EC-TAB-2016-52.pdf

García Cabrera, G. (2020). El derecho a recurrir. Acento, 1.

García, A. I. (2012). Realidad Jurídica y Penal de Suramérica. Bogotà: Temis. Gonzaíni, O. A. (2004). El Debido Proceso. Santa Fe: Rubinzal Culzoni.

Gordillo, G. D. (2015). Manual Teórico Práctico de Derecho Constitucional. Bogotá: COOPS.

Hernández Caro, L. (2020). Doble instancia y doble conforme : antecedentes y estado actual en el derecho procesal penal colombiano y países latinoamericanos. Medellin: EAFIT Repositorio. https://repository.eafit.edu.co/handle/10784/17039

Iberley Colex. (2020). Recursos Penales. Iberley, 1.

Maier, J. B. (2004). Derecho Procesal Penal. Buenos Aires: Editores del Puerto.

Mendoza, N. (2016). La Tutela Judicial Efectiva y el Debido Proceso. Quevedo: Repositorio Uniandes.

ONU, O. d. (16 de Diciembre de 1966). Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos. Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas de Derechos Humanos: https://www.ohchr.org/sp/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx

Ramirez, J. M. (2010). Medios de Impugnación. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona.

Saltos Andrade, A. (08 de Septiembre de 2017). Repositorio Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil. http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/bitstream/3317/8714/1/T- UCSG-POS-MDC-87.pdf

Tiezzi, F. (2017). Doble conforme: La Garantía del imputado. Argumentos, 1. http://revistaargumentos.justiciacordoba.gob.ar/index.php/primera/article/view/81/5 9

Torres, J., & Cornejo, S. (2018). El principio de doble conforme desde la perspectiva regional. El Peruano Jurídica, 2.