Solidarity value and leadership in adults of the Galápagos Neighborhood of Santa Elena Canton, 2023.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study has explored the relationship between solidarity value and leadership in the Galápagos Neighborhood community of Santa Elena Canton, Ecuador. The results show that 54% of adults in the community have a high level of solidarity value, while 59% have a moderate level of leadership. Additionally, a weak positive correlation has been found between solidarity value and leadership, with a correlation coefficient of 0.256 and a bilateral significance value of 0.010. The regression model has indicated that solidarity value explains 6.5% of the variation in leadership. The findings suggest that although collaboration and mutual aid are important in the community, they do not guarantee that community members have effective leadership skills. It is also important to provide opportunities for the development of effective leadership skills and to address barriers that may be limiting leadership capacity and solidarity value in the community. In summary, these results provide an initial understanding of the relationship between solidarity value and leadership in the Galápagos Neighborhood community of Santa Elena Canton, Ecuador, and may be useful for the development of interventions and programs that promote collaboration, mutual aid, solidarity value, and effective leadership in the community.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Derechos de autor
Las obras que se publican en 593 Digital Publisher CEIT están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1.1. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
1.1.a. Se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL).
1.1.b. No se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos.
1.1.c. Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
References
Águila, Adasme, Paredes, & Letelier. (2021). Ollas comunes: la solidaridad se cocina a fuego lento. En Tapia, Letelier, Cubillos, & Micheletti, Lo comunitario: alternativas en tiempos de crisis (págs. 52 - 74). Ediciones UCM. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357063305_Ollas_comunes_la_solidaridad_se_cocina_a_fuego_lento_Lo_Comunitario_UCM_2021
Albert, Dodeler, & Ohin. (2022). How Organizations can Develop Solidarity in the Workplace? A Case Study. Humanistic Management Journal, 7(1), 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-022-00135-3
Alharbi, & Rucker. (2023). Discursive practices of the performative theory of solidarity discourse. Language Sciences, 95(1), epub. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101515
Benmira, & Agboola. (2021). BMJ Leader. The learning zone, 5(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000296
Castañeda, & Dávila. (2021). Haciendo camino al andar: características de los líderes y lideresas comunitarias en el sur de Córdoba y Urabá - Darién. Caso CORDUPAZ Colombia. El ágora USB, 21(2), 502 - 519. https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.5126
Guerrero, H. (2021). El impacto del Lider Comunitario en el siglo XXI. Corporación Universidad de la Costa.
Kanaga, & Mary. (2021). Advancing Solidarity Through Transformational Leadership: Contributions Of Women Leaders In Makin An Equitable And Just Society. International Journal of Aquatic Science, 12(2), 483-490. https://bit.ly/42SGVns
Monereo. (2022). Inclusión social, división del trabajo y sistema democrático. REJLSS: Revista de Estudios Jurídicos Laborales y de Seguridad Social: Una reflexión sobre la teoría social de Drrkheim., 1(4), 20-73. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8386768.pdf
Musoke. (2021). But what is Leadership? A Systematic Review of the Leadership Concept in View of Heightened Educational Leadership in Africa. Journal of education and Practice, 12(9), 127-138. https://bit.ly/3O0xBJS
Odumeru. (2020). Transformational vs. Transactional Leadership Theories: Evidence in Literature. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(2). https://bit.ly/3O5CD80
Parijs. (2021). European values: solidarity. Ratio Juris, 34(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/raju.12310
Perdomo, Pirela, & Rodríguez. (2023). Pedagogies of solidarity: service-learning model for social transformation. a view from the university. Revista Cátedra, 6(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v6i1.4015
Pornschlegel. (2021). Solidarity in the EU: More hype than substance? Organización de Estados Americanos. https://www.epc.eu/content/PDF/2021/EU_solidarity_IP.pdf
Schmitt. (2022). Solidarity. SSOAR, 43(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.30424/OEJS2204045
Souza, Kim, & Silmere. (2021). An exploration of human rights and social work education in the United States. Journal of Human Rights and social work, 7(1), 189-201. https://bit.ly/3BmB4eo
Vera, & Romero. (2022). El desarrollo local desde la mirada del liderazgo comunitario. Minerva Journal, 3(9), 28-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v3i9.70