El Nursing OPT for learning and assessment of palliative care in Nursing. From assessment for passing to assessment for learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Assesment is the process by which one person observes the performance of another. The characteristics of an ideal evaluation are validity, reliability, acceptability, profitability and educational impact (Schuwirth et al., 2017); Fulfilling these characteristics is a challenge for the evaluation designer, hence the need to combine strategies that allow the subject to be evaluated comprehensively. Currently, the Outcome Present State Test -OPT model is a tool that establishes a structure for the clinical reasoning of problems, focusing them on the expected results in nursing practice. It raises the importance of reorienting the teaching and learning of the nursing process by thinking about it in reflective terms, facilitating the development of clinical reasoning skills. The objective was to measure the relative learning increase (RAI) of clinical reasoning in palliative nursing through the use of the OPT Model as a pedagogical and evaluation strategy in the fifth semester of nursing at the Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas. This is an observational study, which measured the relative increase in learning clinical reasoning in palliative nursing through the use of the OPT Model, with a programmatic evaluation system, which evaluated clinical reasoning in palliative nursing with a clinical case in two moments. The first day of the module as diagnostic evaluation and the last day as exit evaluation. The two results were compared with the AKI measure, as follows; The calculation of the IRA was carried out by virtue of the following function: ((Score in the EDS - Score in the EDI) / Score in the EDI)). (EDI, Diagnostic Evaluation of Admission, EDS, exit evaluation). Regarding the results, learning was 230% for the overall course. The average yield increase was up 1.3 times. There were no significant differences by gender. We conclude that evaluation is a learning tool (Cano et. al, 2017) when we manage to design objective, transparent instruments that allow us to identify the process and where both the teacher and the student recognize the objective of their learning by providing feedback in time. real. The assessment of clinical reasoning in palliative nursing through the use of OPT as a pedagogical strategy and evaluation instrument is innovative and provides substantial elements for curricular alignment (Biggs, 2011). and systematic, progressive and a fair assesment
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Derechos de autor
Las obras que se publican en 593 Digital Publisher CEIT están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1.1. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
1.1.a. Se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL).
1.1.b. No se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos.
1.1.c. Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
References
Alfayoumi I. The impact of combining concept-based learning and concept-mapping pedagogies on nursing students’ clinical reasoning abilities.
Nurse Educ Today. 2019; 72: 40-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.009.
Bartlett R, Bland A, Rossen E, Kautz D, Benfield S, Carnevale T. Evaluation of the outcome-present state test model as a way to teach Clinical reasoning. 2008; 47(8): 337-344. doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20080801-01.
Bland AR, Rossen EK, Bartlett R, Kautz DD, Carnevale T, Benfield S. Implementation and testing of the OPT MODEL as a teaching strategy in an
undergraduate psychiatric nursing course. 2009;30(1): 14-21.
Bulecheck G, Butcher HK, Dochterman J.Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)- 5th Ed. 2013. https://www.elsevier.com/books/nursing-interventions-classification-nic/bulechek/978-0-323-05340-2.
Cano M, L., Osorio de Sarmiento, M., Encizo, S., & Bernal, G. (2017). El uso de las rúbricas en el desarrollo del razonamiento hipotético-deductivo en estudiantes de medicina en una universidad colombiana. Entramados : educación y sociedad, 0(4), 185-200. Recuperado de https://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/entramados/article/view/2049/2507
Carvalho EC, de Souza Oliveira-Kumakura AR,Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos Morais S. Clinical reasoning in nursing: teaching strategies and
assessment tools. 2017; 70(3): 662-668. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0509.
Cowen PS, Moorhead S. Current issues in nursing.St. Louis Mo. Mosby Elsevier; 2011.12. Kautz D, Kuiper RA, Pesut DJ, Knight-Brown P. Promoting clinical reasoning in Undergraduate nursing students: application and evaluation of the
outcome present state test (OPT) model of Clinical reasoning. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2005; 2(1):1548-923X doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-
X.1052.
Da Costa CPV, Luz MHBA. Digital learning objectfor diagnostic reasoning in nursing applied to the integumentary system. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2015;
Epstein, R. M. (2007). Assessment in medical education. New England journal of medicine, 356(4), 387-396.
Griggs K, Arms T. Outcome-present state test model for expanding students’ clinical reasoning.Nurse Educator. 2019; 44(3). doi: 10.1097/
NNE.0000000000000578.
Herman H. Clasificación completa de diagnósticos enfermeros NANDA-I 2015-2017. https://www.salusplay.com/blog/diagnosticos-enfermeros-nanda-2017/.
(4): 55-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2015.04.54128.
Kautz DD, Kuiper R, Pesut DJ, Williams RL. Using NANDA, NIC, and NOC (NNN) language for clinical reasoning with the Outcome-Present State-Test (OPT) model. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2006;17(3): 129138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618X.2006.00033.x
Kaddoura M, Van-Dyke O, Yang Q. Impact of a concept map teaching approach on Nursing students’ critical thinking skills. Nurs Health Sci.2016; 18(3): 350-354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12277.
Kuiper RA. Integration of innovative Clinical reasoning pedagogies into a baccalaureate Nursing curriculum. Creat Nurs. 2013; 19(3): 128-139. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.19.3.128.
Herdman H, Kamitsuru S. NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses: definitions and classification 2015 - 2017; 2015. https://www.wiley.com//legacy/wileychi/nanda/?type=Home.
Hlebowitsh, P. (2021). Ralph Tyler, the Tyler rationale, and the idea of educational evaluation. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
Ibáñez LE, Amaya de Gamarra IC, Niño Bautista L. El proceso de rediseño curricular en el Programa de enfermería de la UIS. Una propuesta Innovadora.
Salud UIS. 2002; 34(2): 128-137.
Jael SA. Use of Outcome-Present state test model of clinical reasoning with Filipino
nursing students. Loma Linda University Elect Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 387.https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/387.
Moorhead Sue, Jhonsson M, Maas M, Swansson E. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) -5th Edition. 2012. https://www.elsevier.com/
books/nursing-outcomes-classification-noc/moorhead/978-0-323-10010-6.
Murphy JI. Using focused reflection and articulation to promote clinical reasoning: An evidence-based teaching strategy. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004;
(5): 226-231.
Roca Llobet J. El Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico a través de diferentes metodologías docentes en el Grado en Enfermería. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/129382.
Simmons B. Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2010; 66(5): 1151-1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.x.
Schuwirth L.W.T. and Van der Vleuten C.P.M How to Design a Useful Test: The Principles of Assessment. (2019). En Swanwick T., Forrest K. & O'Brien B.C. Understanding Medical Education (pp 277-290) Third Edition. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary-wiley.com.ez.urosario.edu.co/doi/book/10.1002/9781119373780
Rifà Ros R, Pérez I. Application of an OPT model in a paediatric nursing clinical case in primary health care. Enferm Clin. 2011; 21(3): 168-172. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2010.10.013
Salud UIS vol. 52(1), enero-marzo de 2020DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v52n1-2020004
Schuwirth L.W.T. and Van der Vleuten C.P.M How to Design a Useful Test: The Principles of Assessment. (2019). En Swanwick T., Forrest K. & O'Brien B.C. Understanding Medical Education (pp 277-290) Third Edition. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary-wiley com.ez.urosario.edu.co/doi/book/10.1002/9781119373780
Stone, J. C., Madaus, G. F., Stufflebeam, D., & Tyler, R. W. (1990). Educational evaluation: Classic works of Ralph W. tyler. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 12(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163590
Pesut DJ, Herman J. OPT: Transformation of nursing
process for contemporary practice. Nurs Outlook. 1998; 46(1): 29-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6554(98)90022-7
Pesut DJ. 21ts century nursing knowledge work:reasoning into the future. Weaver C, Delaney CW, Wewber P, Carr R. (1st ed.) Nursing and informatics for the 21st century: an internacional look at practice, trends and the future. 2006. pp.13-
Chicago IL: HIMSS.
Pink DH. A whole new mind: moving from the information age to the conceptual age. New York :Riverhead Books; 2005. p282 . http://archive.org/details/wholenewmindmovi00pink.
Tampy H, Willert E, Ramani S. Assessing Clinical Reasoning: targeting the higher levels of the pyramid. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(8): 1631-1636.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04953-4.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vageriya, V. (2018). Assessment and Evaluation- In Perspective of Medical Education. Nursing & Healthcare International Journal, 2(4), 000154.