The importance of preventing pretrial detention for individuals with mental disorders

Main Article Content

Karolay Priscila Saavedra-Flores

Abstract

From a legal point of view, pre-trial detention measures do not apply to people with mental illness. However, the criminal authorities, in most cases, are ordering preventive detention without determining or diagnosing before their admission with seriousness or sufficiency the true psychiatric situation of the accused person. Due to this type of situation, criminal records are increasingly accompanied by documents that lack substantiation. This leads to the judicial body not applying a correct decision to the specific case, issuing measures such as preventive detention and other restrictions on their freedom. Forensic psychiatrists study criminal law in depth by promoting an evaluation of patients who must appear before the courts. Specialists conduct risk assessments on people with mental disorders within the process. In this way, judges can make better quality decisions based on a full report, avoiding the mistakes of granting pretrial detention to people with mental illnesses and replacing them with security measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saavedra-Flores, K. . (2022). The importance of preventing pretrial detention for individuals with mental disorders. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 7(5-3), 324-340. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2022.5-3.1410
Section
Law
Author Biography

Karolay Priscila Saavedra-Flores, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Manabí - Ecuador

Karolay Saavedra Flores is a lawyer and a member of the staff of the Governor's Office of Azuay. She graduated from the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja. Her professional background includes experience in family, civil, criminal and mediation matters, she has specialized in jurisprudence courses in criminal, civil and labor law, and has extensive experience. 

References

Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial - Órgano Del Gobierno Del Ecuador, 144.

Bacigalupo Z., E. (1996). Manual de Derecho Penal - Parte General. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Editorial Temis S. A.

Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos. (1977). Convención Interamericana sobre Derechos Humanos (Pacto de San José). Acuerdo Ministerial# 202 - Registro Oficial# 801, 1–25. file:///Users/leninchamba/Downloads/Convención Interamericana sobre Derechos Humanos.pdf

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2020a). Caso No 114-19-JH. 114.

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2020b). Sentencia No. 302-19-JH. 25(302), 4–7.

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2022). Sentencia No. 7-18-JH y acumulados/22 (Prisión preventiva a personas con enfermedad mental) Jueza ponente: Karla Andrade Quevedo. 22(7), 1–50.

Cueva Tamariz, A. (2004). Introducción a la psiquiatría forense. Cuenca: Universidad del Azuay.

Durcan, G., & Zwemstra, J. C. (2014). 11. Mental health in prison Key points. Prisons and Health, 3, 87.

Evans, C., Labour, M. P., Flint, C., Labour, M. P., Valley, D., Graham, L., Conservative, M. P., & Perthshire, S. (2017). House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Mental health in prisons. December. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubacc/400/400.pdf

Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Quito-Ecuador: Registro Oficial, 449, 20-10.

Fontán Balestra, C. (1998). Derecho Penal. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot

Iñigo, C. & Márquez, I. (2011). Guía atención primaria de salud mental en prisión.

James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2005). STATS: Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, 12. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf

Jiménez de Asúa, L. (1980). Principios del Derecho Penal - La ley y el delito.

Penrose, L. (2011). Mental disease and crime: Outline of a comparative study of European statistics. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1939.tb00704.x

Vargas Alvarado, E. (1991). Medicina forense y deontología médica. México: Editorial Trillas.

Welzel, H. (2004). El Nuevo Sistema del Proceso Penal, Una introducción a la doctrina de la acción finalista. Buenos Aires: Editrorial B de F.

Urzua Cury, E. (1997). Derecho Penal, Parte General, Tomo II. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.